For god sake:
Tell me where are you from? Where did you find such a genius idea? What do you want to achieve by wasting nearly $20 million dollars budget for such a useless project? Do you want to create peace and instability in Ukraine by building such a wall? Do you think that you can finish the civil war in Ukraine by building such a wall?
Note: Honestly tell me that you want to offer a fat business opportunity to one of your relative or friend by this plan; but do not tell me that you are trying to maximize the security of Ukraine by building this wall. Because you are insulting my intelligence. By the way, read some notes about the Berlin wall, the wall between the USA and Mexico, the wall between Palestine and Israel, and the great Chinese wall and their positive and negative effects; maybe you learn something.
In the era of total confusion, the stupidity of man kind is unlimited.
M. Sirani 31.12.2014
There are a few lengthy academic essays in this blog. Among them A- The Structure of Power in the Islamic Republic of Iran (Published on TERRORISM RESEARCH & ANALYSIS CONSORTIUM WEBSITE (TRAC), B- Iran Should not Get the Nuclear Bomb (Criticizes K. Waltz's Defensive Realism and Touches FP of Iran in the ME) & C- IRGC could be mentioned (NMBU-2008-2013).The rest are short impromptu analyses and predictive forecasts without any editing. All Rights Reserved.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Happy New Year Notes For My Friends and Enemies.
- A Simple Note For My Friends and Allies:
Happy new year & my best wishes to you and your loved ones, wherever you are.- A Short Note For My Enemies, Wherever They Are:
Stay alive and be prepared for more comprehensive and fundamental surprises from me in the next coming year/s.M. Sirani 30.12.2014
Monday, December 29, 2014
Egypt Bans Movie 'Exodus'.Thus Let's Support the Muslim Brotherhood Against Al Sisi Dictator; As Some Western Media Indirectly Dictate.
Sony is hacked; let's blame North Korea without any credible and reliable evidence.
Malaysian airline MH17 is shot down; let's blame Russia and Putin for that tragic event without any reliable evidence.
Egypt bans Exodus movie. Thus Al- Sisi is a great dictator and should be replaced by so-called a democratic organization like the Muslim Brotherhood as some western media directly or indirectly propose.
Putin gave his coat to Chinese first lady. Oh Putin wanted to hit on Chinese first lady.
Nicaragua is building a canal, which would compete with Panama canal! This canal would ruin Nicaragua and the rest of the world economically as some western media claim.
And the list of jargon continues...........bla bla bla.
I'm really sicking tired of jargon and bullshit of some of the western media. I don't even use such newspapers for cleaning the windows of my home.
M. Sirani 29.12.2014
Malaysian airline MH17 is shot down; let's blame Russia and Putin for that tragic event without any reliable evidence.
Egypt bans Exodus movie. Thus Al- Sisi is a great dictator and should be replaced by so-called a democratic organization like the Muslim Brotherhood as some western media directly or indirectly propose.
Putin gave his coat to Chinese first lady. Oh Putin wanted to hit on Chinese first lady.
Nicaragua is building a canal, which would compete with Panama canal! This canal would ruin Nicaragua and the rest of the world economically as some western media claim.
And the list of jargon continues...........bla bla bla.
I'm really sicking tired of jargon and bullshit of some of the western media. I don't even use such newspapers for cleaning the windows of my home.
M. Sirani 29.12.2014
Sunday, December 28, 2014
It's Time the United Nations Clean Up the Mess In Syria.
The Syrian Regime has officially announced that it is ready to negotiate with the opposition. This is a positive sign and the UN should use it. The UN should take initiative and clean up the mess in Syria in an appropriate and professional manner. Regardless of the presence of ISIS in Syria and close correlation between civil war in Syria and Iraq, this goal is achievable; of course, if the UN would perform its plan in this matter in a decisive and proper manner.
M. Sirani 28.12.2014
Further reading:
1- A plan that might save the world from an additional disaster.
http://irancare.blogspot.no/2013/09/a-plan-that-might-save-world-from.html
2- An assessment about the current civil war in Syria.
http://irancare.blogspot.no/2013/08/an-assessment-about-current-civil-war_8919.html
M. Sirani 28.12.2014
Further reading:
1- A plan that might save the world from an additional disaster.
http://irancare.blogspot.no/2013/09/a-plan-that-might-save-world-from.html
2- An assessment about the current civil war in Syria.
http://irancare.blogspot.no/2013/08/an-assessment-about-current-civil-war_8919.html
Friday, December 26, 2014
The Emergence of a New Cold War is Mainly The Western Countries Direct and Intentional Fault.
Briefly:
Finally, by choosing wrong policy, miscalculation and adventitious behavior, the Western countries dragged Russia into a new cold war. The West, particularly the EU countries will lose more than Russia in this battle in different terms.
The policy makers in the West should pay attention to the following issues carefully:
- Putin (and probably his follower) is neither Yeltsin nor Gorbachev that the Western countries could buy them with different price.
- Current Russia is not and would not be like devastated Russia in the late 1980s and beginning 1990s.
- The international politics in different terms is not like those years following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
- The power and leverages of all the Western countries in different terms are not the same as those years in 1980s or 1990s.
- Contrary to the Western countries, new powers in different terms have emerged in the international arena.
- Currently most of the Western countries are struggling with some type of economic crisis in different scale.
And many other reasons,,,,,,
M. Sirani 27.12.2014
Finally, by choosing wrong policy, miscalculation and adventitious behavior, the Western countries dragged Russia into a new cold war. The West, particularly the EU countries will lose more than Russia in this battle in different terms.
The policy makers in the West should pay attention to the following issues carefully:
- Putin (and probably his follower) is neither Yeltsin nor Gorbachev that the Western countries could buy them with different price.
- Current Russia is not and would not be like devastated Russia in the late 1980s and beginning 1990s.
- The international politics in different terms is not like those years following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
- The power and leverages of all the Western countries in different terms are not the same as those years in 1980s or 1990s.
- Contrary to the Western countries, new powers in different terms have emerged in the international arena.
- Currently most of the Western countries are struggling with some type of economic crisis in different scale.
And many other reasons,,,,,,
M. Sirani 27.12.2014
Thursday, December 25, 2014
Another Political Suicide For President Obama.
Multiple Western experts say: North Korea is not behind the Sony Hack; this is probably an inside job.
The hasty reaction of Barack Obama as the president of the most powerful country in the world in this matter is really shocking me. This is not the first time and i believe it would not be the last time that we see such a hasty reaction from President Obama. In this respect, many examples could be mentioned. Among them, the hasty reaction of president Obama following the latest chemical attack in Syria, which he said the USA would attack Syria, or the hasty reaction of the President with regards to President Mubarak could be mentioned.
I'm really wondering: is President Obama himself eager to commit political suicide in every possible way? Or would someone or some people in the circle of the white house like to intentionally ruin the reputation of President Obama by such a false and fake information?
Whatsoever, by such a wrong move, he is losing his credibility and reliability in the domestic as well as international arena.
M. Sirani 25.12.2014
Reference:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2887081/North-Korea-NOT-Sony-hack-according-multiple-security-experts-discredit-FBI-findings-reveal-insider-named-Lena-responsible.html
The hasty reaction of Barack Obama as the president of the most powerful country in the world in this matter is really shocking me. This is not the first time and i believe it would not be the last time that we see such a hasty reaction from President Obama. In this respect, many examples could be mentioned. Among them, the hasty reaction of president Obama following the latest chemical attack in Syria, which he said the USA would attack Syria, or the hasty reaction of the President with regards to President Mubarak could be mentioned.
I'm really wondering: is President Obama himself eager to commit political suicide in every possible way? Or would someone or some people in the circle of the white house like to intentionally ruin the reputation of President Obama by such a false and fake information?
Whatsoever, by such a wrong move, he is losing his credibility and reliability in the domestic as well as international arena.
M. Sirani 25.12.2014
Reference:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2887081/North-Korea-NOT-Sony-hack-according-multiple-security-experts-discredit-FBI-findings-reveal-insider-named-Lena-responsible.html
Beginning Today, Iran is Performing A Massive Military Maneuver in the Region.
The Iranian Regime Joint Armed Forces (Ground, Naval and Air forces) are performing a massive military maneuver in the Middle East. This military maneuver, which has begun today, will take six days and will cover an area of circa 2.2 million square kilometers from the Strait of Hormuz to the Gulf of Aden, as some of the Iranian military officials claimed. Different types of military equipment including submarine, destroyer, warship, aircraft, helicopter and missile will be used in this maneuver. By such a massive military maneuver, Iran would try to demonstrate its hard power to the Arab world and those western countries that have some military base across the Middle East.
Note: The Iranian Regime Santa Clause is delivering presents to all the people around the globe by this massive military maneuver. Merry Christmas.
M. Sirani 25.12.2014
Note: The Iranian Regime Santa Clause is delivering presents to all the people around the globe by this massive military maneuver. Merry Christmas.
M. Sirani 25.12.2014
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Ukrainian Membership in NATO Simply Means: Dividing the Whole Country into Two Ukrainian and Russian Pieces.
Do not provoke Russia by such a move. Such a move would undoubtedly divide Ukraine into two Ukrainian and Russian pieces. In case of offering NATO membership to Ukraine, the scope of tension in Ukraine will additionally spread to other parts of the EU particularly within the Baltic States.
M. Sirani 23.12.2014
M. Sirani 23.12.2014
Nicaragua Canal Project; Another Progressive Step For BRICS Group.
Briefly:
I'm wondering do the western pundits and politicians follow such a move? Do they observe the gradual and progressive moves of BRICS group in different terms including this one? Do they have the capability to put together all these puzzles and illustrate a complete picture about the future situation?
Note: For some decades the Panama Canal was one of the most geostrategic locations around the globe, which was under the control and command of the western countries particularly the USA. By building the Nicaragua Canal, the Panama Canal would lose its importance in different terms. In addition, the Nicaragua Canal would give the BRICS group more independence and upper hand in terms of economic, international maritime trade, strategic and military matters. In short, we are in the transformation phase of the rise and fall of empires, as i have mentioned in some of my earlier posts. East and South versus West.
M. Sirani 23.12.2014
I'm wondering do the western pundits and politicians follow such a move? Do they observe the gradual and progressive moves of BRICS group in different terms including this one? Do they have the capability to put together all these puzzles and illustrate a complete picture about the future situation?
Note: For some decades the Panama Canal was one of the most geostrategic locations around the globe, which was under the control and command of the western countries particularly the USA. By building the Nicaragua Canal, the Panama Canal would lose its importance in different terms. In addition, the Nicaragua Canal would give the BRICS group more independence and upper hand in terms of economic, international maritime trade, strategic and military matters. In short, we are in the transformation phase of the rise and fall of empires, as i have mentioned in some of my earlier posts. East and South versus West.
M. Sirani 23.12.2014
Friday, December 19, 2014
Do Not Dreaming; Avoid Mirror Imaging
Briefly:
- Cuba is not Iran
- Castro is not Khamenei
- The Ideological characteristic of the Cuban political system is not the same as the Islamic Regime in Iran
- The high ranking politicians in Cuba are not thinking and acting the same as those stone age minded - Islamic politicians in Tehran
- The political system in Cuba has not been moving and acting the same as the political system in Iran
Thus: do not dreaming; avoid mirror imaging, when it comes to making any deal including the nuclear negotiation with the Iranian Regime.
M. Sirani 19.12.2014
- Cuba is not Iran
- Castro is not Khamenei
- The Ideological characteristic of the Cuban political system is not the same as the Islamic Regime in Iran
- The high ranking politicians in Cuba are not thinking and acting the same as those stone age minded - Islamic politicians in Tehran
- The political system in Cuba has not been moving and acting the same as the political system in Iran
Thus: do not dreaming; avoid mirror imaging, when it comes to making any deal including the nuclear negotiation with the Iranian Regime.
M. Sirani 19.12.2014
Thursday, December 18, 2014
A Shocking, Unbelievable News: The EU Removed Hamas From Its Terrorist List.
That does not mean that i'm agree with every foreign policy move of Israel in the Middle East, but i'm wondering based on what logical reasoning the EU has removed Hamas from its terrorist list? What would the EU want to achieve by such a move? Would the policy makers in the EU think that they are facilitating the peace process between Israel and Palestine by such a move? Would the policy makers in the EU think that they can magically change the aggressive nature of a terrorist group like Hamas by such a move? Would the policy makers in the EU dream that they can change the barbaric behavior of Hamas in different terms by participating Hamas in the international politics following such a move? Do the policy makers in the EU remember how Hamas did execute the Palestinian people in the street of Gaza Strip just couple of months ago? Do the policy makers in the EU remember how Hamas members dragged the body of innocent executed Palestinian people behind their motor cycles in the streets of Gaza Strip? Do the policy makers in the EU have any idea about the close relationship between Hamas and other terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Jihad in the region? Do the policy makers in the EU have any idea about different illegal activities of Hamas around the globe? Do the policy makers in the EU dream that they can indirectly push the prime minister Netanyahu toward a peace agreement with Palestine by such a move?
And many other questions.......
Note: In the era of total confusion, some Genius Policy Maker should shock us on daily bases. This news is one of them.
M. Sirani 18.12.2014
And many other questions.......
Note: In the era of total confusion, some Genius Policy Maker should shock us on daily bases. This news is one of them.
M. Sirani 18.12.2014
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Normalizing the U.S. and Cuba Relations: A Logical, Reasonable and Nice Move of the Obama Administration.
A logical, reasonable and significant move; although the Obama administration should have done it earlier.
M. Sirani 17.12.2014
M. Sirani 17.12.2014
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
Michael Hayden's Interview with BBC Amid the CIA Torture Report.
Today, i watched Michael Hayden's interview with BBC amid the recent torture report. Mr. Hayden's responses to various questions were unbelievably illogical, unreasonable and totally destructive for himself in different terms. In addition to this controversial torture report, Mr. Hayden, committed a devastating political suicide with this interview. By such unreasonable responses, Mr. Hayden put an end to his official political career in the U.S. political system for ever. From now on, no political official in the U.S. would dare to offer Mr. Hayden an official position within the U.S. political system.
M. Sirani 10.12.2014
M. Sirani 10.12.2014
Monday, December 8, 2014
Iran is Secretly Trying to Buy Some Equipment for Its Heavy Water Reactor.
One of the main concerns of the international community is Iran's Heavy Water Nuclear Reactor near Arak; a nuclear facility, which would produce plutonium. By using the produced plutonium in this facility, Iran would be able to develop nuclear weapon. That's why, a fundamental modification in the structure of Arak nuclear facility has become one of the main demands of 5+1 in its nuclear negotiation with Iran.
Regarding this issue, different statements have been issued by various politicians in Tehran. Couple of months ago, for example, Ali Akbar Salehi, Iran's head of Atomic Energy Organization, in an interview stated that Iran might change the structure of Arak facility, if the Western countries are concerned about it. Contrary to this claim, Hassan Rouhani recently in a speech claimed that Iran will not shut down any nuclear facility including the Heavy Water Reactor in Arak. Regardless of these contradictory claims, the U.S. authority has been informed that Iran is secretly seeking to buy different equipment for its Heavy Water Reactor in the international market (Foreign policy, 2014).
M. Sirani 08.12.2014
Reference:
http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/12/08/us-accuses-iran-of-secretly-breaking-un-nuclear-sanctions-exclusive/
Regarding this issue, different statements have been issued by various politicians in Tehran. Couple of months ago, for example, Ali Akbar Salehi, Iran's head of Atomic Energy Organization, in an interview stated that Iran might change the structure of Arak facility, if the Western countries are concerned about it. Contrary to this claim, Hassan Rouhani recently in a speech claimed that Iran will not shut down any nuclear facility including the Heavy Water Reactor in Arak. Regardless of these contradictory claims, the U.S. authority has been informed that Iran is secretly seeking to buy different equipment for its Heavy Water Reactor in the international market (Foreign policy, 2014).
M. Sirani 08.12.2014
Reference:
http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/12/08/us-accuses-iran-of-secretly-breaking-un-nuclear-sanctions-exclusive/
Sunday, December 7, 2014
Iran's Military Budget Will Increase By Nearly 32% in 2015.
Bearing in mind, the broad economic sanctions imposed on Iran and continuously falling oil price in the international market, the government of so-called "Moderate President Hassan Rouhani", has decided to increase the military budget by nearly 32 percent in 2015. Such a move would help us to anticipate many events including the final outcome of the nuclear negotiation in the next year.
Note: This massive increase in military budget clearly shows that Hassan Rouhani would try to built "a good, peaceful and trustworthy relationship with the international community" as some shallow minded, naive analyst or Iranian Regime's lobbyist claim.
M. Sirani 07.12.2014
Note: This massive increase in military budget clearly shows that Hassan Rouhani would try to built "a good, peaceful and trustworthy relationship with the international community" as some shallow minded, naive analyst or Iranian Regime's lobbyist claim.
M. Sirani 07.12.2014
Friday, December 5, 2014
Do not Deal With ISIS in Both Iraq and Syria With the Same Tactic and Policy.
Dealing with ISIS in both Iraq and Syria with the same tactic and policy is totally wrong, and counterproductive. Such a move would be beneficial in the final stage only for the Iranian and Syrian Regimes and nobody else. The experience of last couple of months war against ISIS confirms my statement. Adjust your plan, before it's too late.
M. Sirani 05.12.2014
M. Sirani 05.12.2014
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Exclusive: Be Aware; Do Not Let the Current Tension in Chechnya Would Intentionally or Unintentionally spillover Into Georgia.
Briefly: Be Aware; Do Not Let the Current Tension in Chechnya Would Intentionally or Unintentionally spillover Into Georgia.
M. Sirani 04.12.2014
M. Sirani 04.12.2014
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Bashar Assad Criticizes the U.S. led Airstrikes Against ISIS. What the F**K?!
In an interview, Bashar Assad claimed that the U.S. led airstrikes are neither serious, nor effective, nor has produced any tangible results so far. Moreover, Bashar Assad stated:
"You can't end terrorism with aerial strikes. Troops on the ground that know the land and can react are essential," (yahoo, 2014).
What does Assad mean by such statements? Does he mean that the U.S. should deploy its ground forces to Syria to fight against ISIS under the command of Bashar Assad? lol
Note: We should not be shocked by such statements from either Bashar Assad or the Iranian Regime. One might wonder why?
Simply, because the current policy of the U.S. and the coalition in both Iraq and Syria is completely beneficial for Assad's regime and the Islamic Regime in Iran. Due to this experience, both the Iranian and Syrian Regimes are demanding more help and support from the U.S. and the coalition in their fight against ISIS. Assad's statement should be understood in this respect.
M. Sirani 03.12.2104
Reference:
http://news.yahoo.com/assad-us-led-airstrikes-not-serious-efficient-120438740.html
"You can't end terrorism with aerial strikes. Troops on the ground that know the land and can react are essential," (yahoo, 2014).
What does Assad mean by such statements? Does he mean that the U.S. should deploy its ground forces to Syria to fight against ISIS under the command of Bashar Assad? lol
Note: We should not be shocked by such statements from either Bashar Assad or the Iranian Regime. One might wonder why?
Simply, because the current policy of the U.S. and the coalition in both Iraq and Syria is completely beneficial for Assad's regime and the Islamic Regime in Iran. Due to this experience, both the Iranian and Syrian Regimes are demanding more help and support from the U.S. and the coalition in their fight against ISIS. Assad's statement should be understood in this respect.
M. Sirani 03.12.2104
Reference:
http://news.yahoo.com/assad-us-led-airstrikes-not-serious-efficient-120438740.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)