Briefly:
When it comes to the U.S. presidential election in 2016, the Democrats are not in a very good position. In this respect, the Obama administration should be blamed mainly due to its weak, incompetent and chaotic foreign policy with regards to various events in the international arena. So far, the only popular Democrat candidate, which might be able to have chance in 2016 election, is H. Clinton. Hillary Clinton has, however, some weaknesses in her political resume. In this respect, her weak and incompetent response with regards to invasion of Libya, Benghazi terrorist attack and email scandal could be mentioned.
Considering this issue, the chance that some Democrat members of the Congress would cooperate with the Republicans and override Obama's veto amid the weak nuclear deal with Iran is very low. Due to the fact that overriding Obama's veto in an important issue such as a nuclear deal with Iran, which supposes to become the golden legacy of the Obama administration with regards to its foreign policy, would inevitably decrease the chance of Democrats in 2016 election.
As such, some of the Democrat members of the Congress might probably close their eyes to the weak and shaky nuclear deal with Iran and do not cooperate with the Republicans in order to save the Democrat candidate in 2016 election. Unless the Republicans would be able to collect the negative secret parts of the deal (whether between the USA and Iran, e.g. WTO membership for Iran, or between Iran and IAEA e.g. Iran is the responsible body for gathering and collecting sample at its own military sites for IAEA, etc) and convince the Democrats that the current nuclear deal is a disastrous agreement.
Note: If the U.S. lawmakers would not be able to to override Obama's veto in this matter, we should simply welcome the Islamic Regime to the nuclear armed countries club. In such a scenario, the next president of the USA, even a Republican, cannot do anything at all about it, due to the fact that following the current deal and lifting the sanction, Iran will quickly become a member of the Shanghai Treaty. Should this happen, the Islamic Regime will become of untouchable nuclear armed revisionist state in the international arena.
M. Sirani 26.07.2015
There are a few lengthy academic essays in this blog. Among them A- The Structure of Power in the Islamic Republic of Iran (Published on TERRORISM RESEARCH & ANALYSIS CONSORTIUM WEBSITE (TRAC), B- Iran Should not Get the Nuclear Bomb (Criticizes K. Waltz's Defensive Realism and Touches FP of Iran in the ME) & C- IRGC could be mentioned (NMBU-2008-2013).The rest are short impromptu analyses and predictive forecasts without any editing. All Rights Reserved.
Sunday, July 26, 2015
Friday, July 24, 2015
According to the Secret Deal Between Iran and IAEA, It Seems Iran Will be Responsible For Collecting the Sample From its Own Military Sites For IAEA.
The Secretary of State John Kerry is repeatedly claiming: "This deal is not based on trust; it is based on the verification".
As a non-American, which English language is not my mother tongue, should i define the term "verification" in this regards for Mr. Kerry? What a pity, the Secretary of State Mr. Kerry has signed a deal with the Islamic Regime; has agreed to send the deal to the UN Security Council, while he hasn't read the IAEA-Iran deal report in this important matter. How on earth could the administration of a super power like the USA do such a huge mistake with regards to a revisionist state like the Islamic Regime in an important issue such as nuclear activity? Unbeliavableeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Note: As i mentioned in earlier posts repeatedly: Iran will obtain nuclear weapon somewhere in the future. In other words, the international community will be left with two options as follows:
1- Accepting a nuclear armed Iran free of any sanctions (In case of lifting the sanctions)
2- Accepting a nuclear armed Iran under severe sanctions.
Which one of these options is less dangerous and more controllable?
My suggestion is choosing the second option (Imposing severe sanctions on Iran) along with performing a fundamental and comprehensive regime change. This is the best solution and less dangerous plan for the whole region. Please do not compare my idea about "performing a fundamental and comprehensive regime change" with what you have done in the past 36 years. During all those years, you have wasted your resources in a totally wrong way and in most of the cases you have helped and promoted either Iranian Regime's lobbyists or you have been trapped in good cup & bad cup tactic of the Islamic Regime.
M. Sirani 24.07.2015
As a non-American, which English language is not my mother tongue, should i define the term "verification" in this regards for Mr. Kerry? What a pity, the Secretary of State Mr. Kerry has signed a deal with the Islamic Regime; has agreed to send the deal to the UN Security Council, while he hasn't read the IAEA-Iran deal report in this important matter. How on earth could the administration of a super power like the USA do such a huge mistake with regards to a revisionist state like the Islamic Regime in an important issue such as nuclear activity? Unbeliavableeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Note: As i mentioned in earlier posts repeatedly: Iran will obtain nuclear weapon somewhere in the future. In other words, the international community will be left with two options as follows:
1- Accepting a nuclear armed Iran free of any sanctions (In case of lifting the sanctions)
2- Accepting a nuclear armed Iran under severe sanctions.
Which one of these options is less dangerous and more controllable?
My suggestion is choosing the second option (Imposing severe sanctions on Iran) along with performing a fundamental and comprehensive regime change. This is the best solution and less dangerous plan for the whole region. Please do not compare my idea about "performing a fundamental and comprehensive regime change" with what you have done in the past 36 years. During all those years, you have wasted your resources in a totally wrong way and in most of the cases you have helped and promoted either Iranian Regime's lobbyists or you have been trapped in good cup & bad cup tactic of the Islamic Regime.
M. Sirani 24.07.2015
Thursday, July 23, 2015
Kerry-Moniz Hearing About Iran's Nuclear Deal.
Briefly:
Based on my knowledge about A- The Islamic Regime, B- Iranian Regime's special characteristics particularly its inherent ideological character, C- Iran's short and long term goals in the Middle East and Africa, D- The history of the Islamic Regime in the past 36 years, E- The revealed details of the current nuclear deal, which indicate the fact that this deal cannot stop Iran in acquiring nuclear weapon, i can simply say that at this stage the international community has left with only two options as follows:
1- Accepting a nuclear armed rich Iran (In case of lifting the sanctions).
2- Accepting a nuclear armed Iran under severe sanctions.
A logical mind would chose the second option based on many reasons.
Note: This is not a deal that would stop Iran. In fact, by this deal, the Obama administration has offered Iran a huge incentive and stimulus package (A type of economic, political and geo-strategical BRIBE) in different terms, hoping that this deal would stop Iran in obtaining nuclear weapon.
M. Sirani 23.07.2015
Based on my knowledge about A- The Islamic Regime, B- Iranian Regime's special characteristics particularly its inherent ideological character, C- Iran's short and long term goals in the Middle East and Africa, D- The history of the Islamic Regime in the past 36 years, E- The revealed details of the current nuclear deal, which indicate the fact that this deal cannot stop Iran in acquiring nuclear weapon, i can simply say that at this stage the international community has left with only two options as follows:
1- Accepting a nuclear armed rich Iran (In case of lifting the sanctions).
2- Accepting a nuclear armed Iran under severe sanctions.
A logical mind would chose the second option based on many reasons.
Note: This is not a deal that would stop Iran. In fact, by this deal, the Obama administration has offered Iran a huge incentive and stimulus package (A type of economic, political and geo-strategical BRIBE) in different terms, hoping that this deal would stop Iran in obtaining nuclear weapon.
M. Sirani 23.07.2015
Do Not Offer Iran WTO Membership; This Is One of Your Last Golden Leverages.
Here below is one of my previous notes in this matter.
M. Sirani 23.07.2015
I have mentioned this issue in some of my previous notes and i repeat it again.
Whatever the final agreement of the nuclear discussion with Iran would become, do not offer WTO membership to Iran at at this stage. I cannot disclose the whole my idea openly in this matter in this weblog. You have absolutely no idea that with help of some simple and small adjustment within the policy and structure of WTO, we can completely paralyze the Iranian Regime at anytime that we want. This is our last chance for causing a serious fundamental change in Iran. This is the best opportunity that unfortunately your genius advisers have not discovered it yet. Think deeply about this issue, before you make any move in this matter.
M. Sirani 11.11.2014
M. Sirani 23.07.2015
Exclusive: I Repeat: Do Not Offer Iran WTO Membership At This Stage.
I have mentioned this issue in some of my previous notes and i repeat it again.
Whatever the final agreement of the nuclear discussion with Iran would become, do not offer WTO membership to Iran at at this stage. I cannot disclose the whole my idea openly in this matter in this weblog. You have absolutely no idea that with help of some simple and small adjustment within the policy and structure of WTO, we can completely paralyze the Iranian Regime at anytime that we want. This is our last chance for causing a serious fundamental change in Iran. This is the best opportunity that unfortunately your genius advisers have not discovered it yet. Think deeply about this issue, before you make any move in this matter.
M. Sirani 11.11.2014
Monday, July 20, 2015
Read Carefully Iran's Statement Following the Adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2231.
Read the statement of the Islamic Regime Following the Adoption of today UN Security Council Resolution 2231. The statement clearly indicates that the west cannot impose any sanction on Iran with regards to its nuclear activity or something else no matter what; the west cannot visit Iran's military sites. In case of imposing sanction on Iran amid for example, nuclear activity or Iran's support of terrorism or developing ballistic missile, Iran can simply withdraw from the agreement and continue with its nuclear enrichment as it wishes. As some examples read the sections 7 and 8. This deal is a disaster and as i have mentioned earlier: the current shaky nuclear deal will pave the way towards a military confrontation with Iran somewhere in the future more than any other plans.
M. Sirani 20.07.2015
Reference:
Tasnim (2015). http://www.tasnimnews.com/english/Home/Single/805276
M. Sirani 20.07.2015
Reference:
Tasnim (2015). http://www.tasnimnews.com/english/Home/Single/805276
Sunday, July 19, 2015
Obama’s Nuclear Deal Will Pave the Way Towards A Military Confrontation Against Iran More Than Any Other Warmonger.
The current
shaky nuclear deal will legally pave the way towards a military confrontation against Iran somewhere in the future .
Wonder why and how? One of the major points of the deal is that IAEA inspectors
should have clear access to any suspicious place no matter nuclear or military,
etc inside Iran. The important point in this matter is that the Supreme Leader along with
the high ranking leaders of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, army, and
Ministry of Defense all have repeatedly claimed that Iran would not allow any
foreign inspector or entity visit its military sites. Such a problematic issue
will automatically give a green light to the USA
and its allies to perform a military strike against Iran somewhere in the future. This
is something that most of the politicians and pundits do not pay attention to
it. Maybe, this is the main plan of the USA . In such a scenario, the U.S. administration does not need too much
effort to convince the public amid a military confrontation with Iran . The U.S. administration, whether the current or future one, can simply say we have done our best to solve the nuclear problem with Iran through a peaceful and diplomatic
manner; but this is Iran
that has violated the agreement.
M. Sirani 19.07.2015
It Would Be A Shame, If the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee Awards Kerry & Zarif. (19.07.2015). #NoNobel4KerryZarif
Such a move will totally put an end to the reputation of the Nobel Peace Prize forever, due to many reasons.
#NoNobel4KerryZarif
M. Sirani 19.07.2015
#NoNobel4KerryZarif
M. Sirani 19.07.2015
Saturday, July 18, 2015
Thursday, July 16, 2015
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
President Obama Threatens the Congress By His Veto Right.
Briefly:
In retaliation, the legislatures can impose further sanctions on Iran. Chaos in the U.S. political system has begun.
M. Sirani 14.07.2015
In retaliation, the legislatures can impose further sanctions on Iran. Chaos in the U.S. political system has begun.
M. Sirani 14.07.2015
The Islamic Regime, Russia and China Won; In Case of Fully Approval the Current Nuclear Deal (Genie is Out of the Bottle).
Briefly:
Following lifting the sanctions, Iran will become a member of the Shanghai Treaty. Should this happen, Iran will secretly develop its nuclear weapon after a while. Thereafter, Iran will continue with its expansionist behavior in the Middle East and Africa in a much more deeper and broader manner and the international community cannot do anything at all about it. Considering this brief information and the notion that Iran is one of the funding member of AIIB, some of those genius in Vienna tell me how on earth then the international community would be able to reverse the sanctions on Iran in the future, if Iran will not meet its obligation in this matter? Use your brain, in such a circumstance, do China and Russia cooperate with the West to reverse the sanctions on Iran? Do China and Russia reverse the sanctions on a funding member of AIIB and Shanghai Treaty?
Say hello to a nuclear-armed Iran and be prepared for more conflicts in the Middle East and Africa. The whole Middle East goes nuclear in the next coming years.
Note: Those genius in Washington, Paris, London and Rome have absolutely no idea that how a nuclear-armed Iran would increase the security of Russia in the Middle East. As an example, look at the nuclear-armed North Korea and China. A nuclear-armed Iran functions the same for Russia and has absolutely no problem for Russia.
M. Sirani 14.07.2015
Following lifting the sanctions, Iran will become a member of the Shanghai Treaty. Should this happen, Iran will secretly develop its nuclear weapon after a while. Thereafter, Iran will continue with its expansionist behavior in the Middle East and Africa in a much more deeper and broader manner and the international community cannot do anything at all about it. Considering this brief information and the notion that Iran is one of the funding member of AIIB, some of those genius in Vienna tell me how on earth then the international community would be able to reverse the sanctions on Iran in the future, if Iran will not meet its obligation in this matter? Use your brain, in such a circumstance, do China and Russia cooperate with the West to reverse the sanctions on Iran? Do China and Russia reverse the sanctions on a funding member of AIIB and Shanghai Treaty?
Say hello to a nuclear-armed Iran and be prepared for more conflicts in the Middle East and Africa. The whole Middle East goes nuclear in the next coming years.
Note: Those genius in Washington, Paris, London and Rome have absolutely no idea that how a nuclear-armed Iran would increase the security of Russia in the Middle East. As an example, look at the nuclear-armed North Korea and China. A nuclear-armed Iran functions the same for Russia and has absolutely no problem for Russia.
M. Sirani 14.07.2015
Monday, July 13, 2015
Iran Has Dragged President Obama & Secretary Kerry Into the Point of No Return.
Obama administration has reached the point of no return in the nuclear negotiation with Iran. If the administration would retreat from negotiation at this stage, it will face a huge critics in domestic as well as international arena. If the administration would continue, it has to give more advantages to Iran in order to make a deal. To put it simply, the administration has to accept Iran's demand or no deal. In both cases the Obama administration will lose to some degree. But, In case of a no deal, the US and international community will lose less.
M. Sirani 13.07.2015
Following this event, they drag you wherever they want in the negotiation. This is one of the regular tactics of the Islamic Regime. This tactic is, to some extent, originated from ancient Parthian dynasty method against their enemies, but the Iranian regime has developed and updated it in this way. As an example, remember the export of Iran's extra uranium to Russia. In many occasions, different Iranian officials openly and publicly were agreed with this point. But, Iranian negotiators suddenly rejected and refused this idea yesterday.
Note: You need to learn more about the Iranian Regime's tactics; a series of tactics that Thomas Schelling, Joseph Nye or any other pundits have not discovered them yet.
M. Sirani 01.04.2015
M. Sirani 13.07.2015
One of the Most Important Tactics of the Islamic Regime in Negotiation.
In the beginning of a negotiation, they use every leverages including smiley face and massive efforts of lobbyists and give you a false and unrealistic hope in one or some issues. They work hard until this false hope would seem so real to you. Gradually and steady, you portray a beautiful picture, which in reality is not true, for yourself about the final outcome of the negotiation. At this stage, you transfer many positive news to your political system, media and fellow citizens. Should this happen, they retreat suddenly from every promise that they had made in the beginning of the negotiation. By using this method, they crush your political reputation and push you into "the point of no return". This is the point that Mr. John Kerry has landed at this stage.Following this event, they drag you wherever they want in the negotiation. This is one of the regular tactics of the Islamic Regime. This tactic is, to some extent, originated from ancient Parthian dynasty method against their enemies, but the Iranian regime has developed and updated it in this way. As an example, remember the export of Iran's extra uranium to Russia. In many occasions, different Iranian officials openly and publicly were agreed with this point. But, Iranian negotiators suddenly rejected and refused this idea yesterday.
Note: You need to learn more about the Iranian Regime's tactics; a series of tactics that Thomas Schelling, Joseph Nye or any other pundits have not discovered them yet.
M. Sirani 01.04.2015
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Warning to the Obama Administration and All the EU Governments: Prevent the Wave of Terror; Protect the Iranian Political Dissidents in Your Countries.
Based on the experience of last 36 years, there is high probability that following a possible nuclear deal, the Iranian regime will begin to assassinate some of the political dissidents abroad. In this respect, the current Obama administration and all the EU countries should be aware of this event and do their best to protect the safety and security of all Iranian political activists in their countries. Do not trade the lives of Iranian political activists in your countries with an useless nuclear deal with the Islamic Regime of Iran.
M. Sirani 12.07.2015
M. Sirani 12.07.2015
In Case of Accepting the Current Nuclear Deal,Iran, Russia and China Are the Main Winners; USA and EU are the Main Losers. Those, Who Disagree With My Statement are Either: 1- Iran's Lobbyists and Spies or 2- Those Naive People, Who, Based on Many Logical Facts, are Unable to Predict that Tomorrow is a Sunny, Cloudy or a Rainy Day.
Iran's Spies Were Seeking Atomic & Missile Technology in Neighboring Germany in the Last Month, According to German Intelligence Sources.
Reference:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/11/double-dealing-iran-violating-nuclear-sanctions-even-as-talks-drag-on/
M. Sirani 12.07.2015
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/11/double-dealing-iran-violating-nuclear-sanctions-even-as-talks-drag-on/
M. Sirani 12.07.2015
Saturday, July 11, 2015
By Implementing the Current Plan, Syriza Party Will Lose the Political Power in Greece In the Next Coming Months.
Briefly: In case of implementing the current plan that Greek Parliament has approved:
The punishment for a political leader, who doesn't anticipate a historical opportunity and doesn't know, how to use it, is the loss of political power. This is the destiny of Syriza political party in Greece in the next coming months.
M. Sirani 11.07.2015
The punishment for a political leader, who doesn't anticipate a historical opportunity and doesn't know, how to use it, is the loss of political power. This is the destiny of Syriza political party in Greece in the next coming months.
M. Sirani 11.07.2015
Friday, July 10, 2015
Brief Historical Lesson For Obama Administration.
Do you want to learn some lesson from the history? Or do you want to sink more in the historical failure and ruin your political reputation?
M. Sirani 10.07.2015
Has Iran Ruined Enough the Reputation of President Obama Among the U.S. Close Allies or Not Yet?
Influenced by Iranian Regime's lobbyists, Obama administration implemented various wrong policies with regards to different events in the Middle East. These wrong policies have caused a serious fragmentation between the USA and its close allies particularly Israel and the Arab countries in the region. At the present, the Obama administration has reached the point of no return. On the one hand, the nuclear deal with Iran, as the administration wished, has become an impossible mission following today's Khamenei speech. On the other hand, the USA has largely lost its credibility and trustworthiness among its close allies in the Middle East. This is a type of divide and govern policy of the Iranian Regime.
I warned about this event just couple of days ago through a short note. Here below is the copy of my previous short note in this matter.
M. Sirani 09.04.2015
One of the Most Important Tactics of the Islamic Regime in Negotiation.
In the beginning of a negotiation, they use every leverages including smiley face and massive efforts of lobbyists and give you a false and unrealistic hope in one or some issues. They work hard until this false hope would seem so real to you. Gradually and steady, you portray a beautiful picture, which in reality is not true, for yourself about the final outcome of the negotiation. At this stage, you transfer many positive news to your political system, media and fellow citizens. Should this happen, they retreat suddenly from every promise that they had made in the beginning of the negotiation. By using this method, they crush your political reputation and push you into "the point of no return". This is the point that Mr. John Kerry has landed at this stage.
Following this event, they drag you wherever they want in the negotiation. This is one of the regular tactics of the Islamic Regime. This tactic is, to some extent, originated from ancient Parthian dynasty method against their enemies, but the Iranian regime has developed and updated it in this way. As an example, remember the export of Iran's extra uranium to Russia. In many occasions, different Iranian officials openly and publicly were agreed with this point. But, Iranian negotiators suddenly rejected and refused this idea yesterday.
Note: You need to learn more about the Iranian Regime's tactics; a series of tactics that Thomas Schelling, Joseph Nye or any other pundits have not discovered them yet.
M. Sirani 01.04.2015
Javad Zarif Should Stand on the Balcony and Laugh at All of You.
In the last 36 years, all the western countries have been using Iranian Regime's lobbyists as their loyal advisers. Due to 36 years apologist and appeasement policy, Zarif should stand on the balcony now and laugh at all of you.
M. Sirani 10.07.2015
M. Sirani 10.07.2015
Desperate President Obama and Mr. John Kerry.
Everybody including the Iranian negotiators know how badly, no matter what and how, the Obama administration needs a nuclear deal with Tehran. This is not the matter of one day or one week or one month ago. Since more than a year ago, the Obama administration has been directly, indirectly, publicly and secretly projecting this idea. A great example, which proves my short statement in this matter, is the totally wrong policy of Obama administration in war against ISIS in both Iraq and Syria. By implementing this wrong policy, the Obama administration did its best to appease the Islamic Regime for a shaky nuclear deal. The result of this appeasement policy is a deeply humiliation and devastating shaky nuclear deal. In doing so, Iran uses all its power to put extra pressure on Obama administration in different terms and get more advantages as much as it can. Because, Iran simply knows that the hands of Obama administration is totally under its stone. (hands under stone= A Iranian proverb).
M. Sirani 10.07.2015
M. Sirani 10.07.2015
Thursday, July 9, 2015
Missing the Nuclear Deadline Is beneficial for Iran in Different Terms.
Missing the nuclear deadline has one problem for Iran: The U.S. Senate will spend 60 days for reviewing the deal and lifting the U.S. sanctions.
But this issue has many complications in short and long term for Obama administration and the U.S. political system. The delay will damage the credibility and reliability of the administration in domestic as well as foreign affairs. Due to this issue, Iran will try to get more advantages from the U.S. as much as it can. This issue will additionally and automatically create a huge fragmentation within the U.S. political system between the members of Democrat Party and moreover between the members of Democratic and Republican Parties amid chaotic policy of Obama administration in this matter. Such a fragmentation and consequently conflict within the U.S. political system will be more beneficial for Iran in both short and long term.
M. Sirani 09.07.2015
But this issue has many complications in short and long term for Obama administration and the U.S. political system. The delay will damage the credibility and reliability of the administration in domestic as well as foreign affairs. Due to this issue, Iran will try to get more advantages from the U.S. as much as it can. This issue will additionally and automatically create a huge fragmentation within the U.S. political system between the members of Democrat Party and moreover between the members of Democratic and Republican Parties amid chaotic policy of Obama administration in this matter. Such a fragmentation and consequently conflict within the U.S. political system will be more beneficial for Iran in both short and long term.
M. Sirani 09.07.2015
Greece and $2 Billion Dollars Gas Deal With Russia.
Some genius within the EU have absolutely no idea what a heavily indebted Greece can do. They think because of nearly $340 billion debt, they can push Greece wherever they want.
These genius do not think about the negative consequences of Grexit from the EU in different terms, for example Grexit from NATO.
Note: If those genius decision makers in Brussels know exactly what type of negative consequences in different terms a Grexit can cause for the EU and the West, they would probably be ready to give a Greece a huge hair cut (debt relief) and keep the country within the EU. What a pity, they don't see the great picture in this matter. The only thing they see is that they have lent money and they should get their money back with interests; exactly like traditional money lender of one thousands years ago. They don't see any other events, for example heavily indebted Greece has nearly 1400 islands and can rent some of these islands to Russia and China for some amount of money.
And many other issues.
M. Sirani 09.07.2015
These genius do not think about the negative consequences of Grexit from the EU in different terms, for example Grexit from NATO.
Note: If those genius decision makers in Brussels know exactly what type of negative consequences in different terms a Grexit can cause for the EU and the West, they would probably be ready to give a Greece a huge hair cut (debt relief) and keep the country within the EU. What a pity, they don't see the great picture in this matter. The only thing they see is that they have lent money and they should get their money back with interests; exactly like traditional money lender of one thousands years ago. They don't see any other events, for example heavily indebted Greece has nearly 1400 islands and can rent some of these islands to Russia and China for some amount of money.
And many other issues.
M. Sirani 09.07.2015
Wednesday, July 8, 2015
Wake Up From Your Delusional Slumber; We Are in 2015, Neither in 1960s, Nor in 70s Nor in 80s.
Expanding NATO close to the walls of Kremlin, threatening China in South East Asia and expecting that the Patriot Missile system in Germany would function probably or the airlines networks would work probably without any interruption. For your own sake, wake up from your delusional slumber. You are jeopardizing the lives of your innocent citizens by your kindergarten foreign policy and greedy attitude.
M. Sirani 08.07.2015
M. Sirani 08.07.2015
Following A Possible Nuclear Deal and Lifting the Sanctions, Iran Will Highly Likely Join the Shanghai Treaty.
As i have repeatedly anticipated this event on some of my previous short notes, Iran will highly likely join the Shanghai Treaty following a possible nuclear deal and lifting the sanctions. Should this happen, the USA and the western countries should get permission from Iran, if they want to perform any move in the Middle East in the near future This condition will be expanded to Africa in the next coming years.
Note: Some genius western politicians and pundits should remember my short note in this matter. I have predicted this event since many years ago.
M. Sirani 08.07.2015
Note: Some genius western politicians and pundits should remember my short note in this matter. I have predicted this event since many years ago.
M. Sirani 08.07.2015
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
In the Next Coming Months and Years, Iran, (the Protégé of Brzezinski) Will Give a Devastating Historical Lesson to the USA, Brzezinski and Those, Who Think like Brzezinski With Regards to Iran. (Remember This Short Sentence).
This would be a payback time; a really and seriously bad one. The Protégé of Brzezinski will crash the reputation and supremacy of the USA in the world; but not with direct military confrontation. Iran will do something that the powerful Soviet Union and the German Nazi couldn't do.
M. Sirani 07.07.2015
M. Sirani 07.07.2015
Not Bounding to the Nuclear Deadline ( July 9) is Fully Beneficial in various forms for Iran in Both the Short And Long Term.
Briefly:
If 5+1 and Iran cannot reach a comprehensive nuclear deal before July 9, the U.S. Senate, instead of 30 days, will spend 60 days to review the deal in order to lift the U.S. sanctions on Iran. During this period of time, the Senate can make the job difficult for the Obama administration amid the nuclear deal. But the Senate cannot fully stop the deal , due to the veto power of the President Obama. The Senate can somehow dismantle the nuclear deal with Iran, if a republican candidate will become the president in 2016 U.S. election. This particular issue, however is not an important theme at the present. The important point is passing the July 9 nuclear deadline and its negative consequences for the Obama administration, the U.S. political system and how the Iranian Regime can benefit from this opportunity in both the short and long term.
Note: Needless to explore all the advantages that Iran can gain by this move, because, those who are currently negotiating in Vienna should have a clear picture about this issue. But in short, in case of a nuclear deal after July 9, Iran will gain a lot in different terms. The gain of Iran in this matter is much broader and deeper than ballistic missile or lifting the UN arm embargo. Iran will reach a strong position that neither a powerful state, nor a powerful authority can do anything at all about the country and its nuclear activity in the future.
M. Sirani 07.07.2015
If 5+1 and Iran cannot reach a comprehensive nuclear deal before July 9, the U.S. Senate, instead of 30 days, will spend 60 days to review the deal in order to lift the U.S. sanctions on Iran. During this period of time, the Senate can make the job difficult for the Obama administration amid the nuclear deal. But the Senate cannot fully stop the deal , due to the veto power of the President Obama. The Senate can somehow dismantle the nuclear deal with Iran, if a republican candidate will become the president in 2016 U.S. election. This particular issue, however is not an important theme at the present. The important point is passing the July 9 nuclear deadline and its negative consequences for the Obama administration, the U.S. political system and how the Iranian Regime can benefit from this opportunity in both the short and long term.
Note: Needless to explore all the advantages that Iran can gain by this move, because, those who are currently negotiating in Vienna should have a clear picture about this issue. But in short, in case of a nuclear deal after July 9, Iran will gain a lot in different terms. The gain of Iran in this matter is much broader and deeper than ballistic missile or lifting the UN arm embargo. Iran will reach a strong position that neither a powerful state, nor a powerful authority can do anything at all about the country and its nuclear activity in the future.
M. Sirani 07.07.2015
Sunday, July 5, 2015
By Oxi, the Majority of Greek People Says: "Foxtrot Oscar" to Neoleiberalism Approach, Austerity Measures and Undemocratic and Unjust International Institutions Such as IMF, ECB.
Greece shows that the old, exploitative, undemocratic, unfair and unjust policy of some international institutions such as IMF and ECB does not function anymore. The world has changed; as such many policies with regards to the international arena should be changed. Otherwise, we will face massive problems in various terms in the world. As an example, if the current international financial organizations such as IMF,WB and ECB do not change their wrong policies, other nations around the world including within the EU will probably follow the path of the Greek people and resist. In this respect, as some examples Spanish, Italian, Portuguese and English people could be mentioned.
Note: We are not living in the 1960s, 70s or 80s anymore. Fundamentally fix it, or face some regional revolution somewhere in the future.
M. Sirani 05.07.2015
Note: We are not living in the 1960s, 70s or 80s anymore. Fundamentally fix it, or face some regional revolution somewhere in the future.
M. Sirani 05.07.2015
The Fate of Obama Administration, The U.S. Democratic Party, Political Career of President Obama and John Kerry All is in The Hand of the Islamic Regime of Iran.
By a simple move, the Islamic Regime of Iran can change the course of political history of the USA at this particular moment.
Note: The Obama administration should give more advantages to Iran in order to save itself.
M. Sirani 05.07.2015
Note: The Obama administration should give more advantages to Iran in order to save itself.
M. Sirani 05.07.2015
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Will You Be Able To Once Again Reverse Sanctions on Iran in the Future Due to Intensifying Conflicts in Ukraine and South East Asia?
1- Has IAEA been able to fully confirm the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear activity?
2- Do you have any permission or authority to visit Iran's military sites, interview the nuclear scientists or check any suspicious sites with regards to Iran's secret nuclear activity in the future?
3- IAEA will release a report about the possible military dimension of Iran's nuclear activity at the end of this year. Do you want to remove the sanctions before releasing this important report by IAEA? Or you want to wait for the IAEA report and then you will remove the sanctions? Should this happen, what would be the reaction of the U.S. Senate in this matter?
4- After more than a decade, the IAEA still has not been able to visit the suspicious sites in Iran or talk to the nuclear scientists or collect the necessary data in order to provide a comprehensive report with regards to Iran's nuclear activity. How would you be able to trust the transparency and cooperative behavior of Iran in the future?
5- The USA and some of the European countries are in some serious conflicts with Russia amid Ukraine tension and China amid its adventurous activities in South East Asia. How on earth would be able to reimpose sanctions on Iran somewhere in the future, if Iran would not meet its obligation with regards to the possible nuclear deal? Will Russia and China fully cooperate with you within the Security Council due to these conflicts?
And many other questions in this regards
Note: You are dreaming to put your name under a shaky and unreliable nuclear deal with Iran in order to promote your political career and be an important part in the historical books. You will achieve this goal; your name will be published in the historical books, but at the special section of some people like Neville Chamberlain.
M. Sirani 04.07.2015
2- Do you have any permission or authority to visit Iran's military sites, interview the nuclear scientists or check any suspicious sites with regards to Iran's secret nuclear activity in the future?
3- IAEA will release a report about the possible military dimension of Iran's nuclear activity at the end of this year. Do you want to remove the sanctions before releasing this important report by IAEA? Or you want to wait for the IAEA report and then you will remove the sanctions? Should this happen, what would be the reaction of the U.S. Senate in this matter?
4- After more than a decade, the IAEA still has not been able to visit the suspicious sites in Iran or talk to the nuclear scientists or collect the necessary data in order to provide a comprehensive report with regards to Iran's nuclear activity. How would you be able to trust the transparency and cooperative behavior of Iran in the future?
5- The USA and some of the European countries are in some serious conflicts with Russia amid Ukraine tension and China amid its adventurous activities in South East Asia. How on earth would be able to reimpose sanctions on Iran somewhere in the future, if Iran would not meet its obligation with regards to the possible nuclear deal? Will Russia and China fully cooperate with you within the Security Council due to these conflicts?
And many other questions in this regards
Note: You are dreaming to put your name under a shaky and unreliable nuclear deal with Iran in order to promote your political career and be an important part in the historical books. You will achieve this goal; your name will be published in the historical books, but at the special section of some people like Neville Chamberlain.
M. Sirani 04.07.2015
Friday, July 3, 2015
The Tax Money of Hard Working And Honest Norwegian People Should Be Wasted on F35.
Fighter jet F16 model 1970s beats F35 model 2014-2015. Norway is going to buy 52, F35 at a price of nearly 67,9 milliard krones. The tax money of honest and hard working Norwegian people should be wasted on F35 for what? Is there any relationship between this contract and choosing a Norwegian politician as the secretary general of NATO or what?
M. Sirani 03.07.2015
Reference:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3144873/U-S-air-force-s-sophisticated-stealth-jet-beaten-dogfight-plane-1970s-despite-expensive-weapon-history.html
M. Sirani 03.07.2015
Reference:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3144873/U-S-air-force-s-sophisticated-stealth-jet-beaten-dogfight-plane-1970s-despite-expensive-weapon-history.html
Javad Zarif's Latest Message Amid A Possible Nuclear Deal Uploaded Today 03.07.2015.
In this 4
minutes video, J. Zarif emphasizes on only two important issues, which are:
1- The super
powers should accept the hegemony of Iran in the region.
2- The super
powers, particularly the western countries, should accept Iran ’s demands;
otherwise, there would be no nuclear deal.
Note: As i have been predicting this event since couple of years ago: Good luck with your delusional reliable nuclear deal with the Islamic Regime of Iran.
M. Sirani
03.07.2015
Wednesday, July 1, 2015
My Prediction Nearly Two Years Ago Amid Iran's Involvement in the Nuclear Talk With 5+1.
Here below is the copy of my short note in this matter. Following the possible nuclear deal with Iran, some might understand what i was talking about.
M. Sirani 01.07.2015
If Iran would be able to lift those sanctions imposed by the Security Council even temporarily, the country would become untouchable, when it comes to its nuclear activity, due to the increasing level of conflicts between Russia, China and the West at the present and also in the future. Should this happen, Russia and China would veto any resolution imposed by the West against Iran within the Security Council. Following this event, Iran will waiting for the Year 2015; a year that Chinese Yuan will become one of the most used international currencies around the globe. This is the golden dream of Iran; this is the time that the Islamic regime will become an untouchable political system in the world.
M. Sirani 11.12.2013
M. Sirani 01.07.2015
A Golden Dream For the Islamic Regime of Iran.
If Iran would be able to lift those sanctions imposed by the Security Council even temporarily, the country would become untouchable, when it comes to its nuclear activity, due to the increasing level of conflicts between Russia, China and the West at the present and also in the future. Should this happen, Russia and China would veto any resolution imposed by the West against Iran within the Security Council. Following this event, Iran will waiting for the Year 2015; a year that Chinese Yuan will become one of the most used international currencies around the globe. This is the golden dream of Iran; this is the time that the Islamic regime will become an untouchable political system in the world.
M. Sirani 11.12.2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)