This is an important issue, which the policy-makers in the US should think about it. In case of any military strike on Syria, the US might probably lose Russian's support within 5+1 negotiation with regard to Iran's nuclear activity. Moreover, Russia might decide to arm Iran with S-300 missiles in retaliation with the US attack on Syria. Furthermore, and again in retaliation, Russia might decide to assist Iran to build a nuclear weapon. A nuclear-armed Iran would create a buffer zone close to Russia in the strategic part of the Middle East. Such a situation would be beneficial for Russia in different aspect. As an example, a nuclear-armed Iran for Russia would be something like nuclear-armed North Korea for China, in the sense that anytime, China faces a conflict with the West, suddenly, out of the blue, North Korea tests a nuclear missile. By this, I don't want to say that all these events will occur in case of a military strike on Syria. But these are important issues that the policy-makers in the US should think about them, when it comes to the type of respond to the recent chemical attack in Syria.
M. Sirani 11.09.2013
M. Sirani 11.09.2013
No comments:
Post a Comment